Atomic-electronic analysis shows that the crate the brain that something is broken, and skull bone plates – just went in different directions. It is perhaps only an increase in brain volume, which in turn soybeans, is possible only when freezing. Version of what the soldiers just pozamerzali, scientists reject as human bodies, have been the natural decay after the cessation of its activity. In short, death occurs due to rupture of the cranium, due to increase in the brain, presumably due to its rapid freezing. We must note one more fact. Ali Partovi gathered all the information. The corpses of the dead or killed in action, always, with honors, were burned.
And found the remains were clearly dumping, and, near the dead were found scraps of leather, with a painted rune Isa. I want to describe another archaeological finds, which introduced the scientists in utter bewilderment. We are talking about the strange burial, a young woman who obviously did not belong to the Scandinavian nation. Rather, it was brought from another location, presumably from the east, as its skull and skeleton, have signs of Mongoloid race. This may explain the way to her burial. In the burial pit next to the dead, was found a bunch of thin stone plitochek on which were carved inscriptions and drawings. They were told that a young princess, the wife of a rich gentleman, could not have a baby, more two years. When his wife asked the shaman, and he spent the divine ritual with rune Berkano and rune Roinz (it should be noted that this rune is little known and used only by experienced runologami and palmistry), the woman safely became pregnant and gave birth to a beautiful heir.
Summary of the book the order of the Speech of Michael Foucault FOUCAULT, M. the order of the Speech. So Paulo: Loyola editions, 1996. Trad. Laura Fraga de Almeida Sampaio.
In the book where Michael Foucault pronounced when assuming the vacant chair in the Collge de France, in 1996, with update in 2010, which had to the great success and the deep relations and correlations between the practical discursivas to be able and them they permeiam that them and they control the speeches in the society, they are for forms of being able and of repression, as the author strengthens when he describes ' ' I assume that in all society the production of the speech is at the same time controlled, selected, organized and redistributed for certain number of procedures that has for function to conjure its powers, to dominate its knowledge random … ' ' (p.8-9). Get all the facts and insights with Ali Partovi, another great source of information. In elapsing of the speech, Foucault clarifies that all speech is controlled for the interdiction, that is, taboos for the speech exist, and that, the right-hander is not had to say everything to any person, in any place or circumstance. According to Foucault, in the society types of taboos that still leave the speech, far from being exist transparent or neutral an element, that would be: the politics and the sexuality, where the sexuality if disarms and the politics if it pacifies, disclosing to the linking between desire and power (P. 10). The author still approaches another principle, of exclusion, thinking about the opposition between reason and madness, where, an insane person is that one whose speech cannot circulate equally to the one of the others, therefore can occur that its null considered word either and is not received, or still, the society does not understand it, and the speech became a noise, only being seen with masked truth in the theater, and thus exactly symbolically.
The system of rights defended by Habermas, have-of containing, exactamente, the rights that the citizens have that to attribute themselves and to recognize themselves, mutually, if wanting legitimately to regulate its convivncia with the ways it positive law. In the truth, the perspective Habermasiana (1998: 188): ' ' The meaning of the expressions: ' ' right positivo' ' ' ' regulation legtima' ' it is clearly and with the concept of legal form, which stabilizes social expectations of behavior in indicated way, and the beginning of the speech, whose light if can examine the legitimacy of the norms of aco.' ' Habermas introduces, then, three categories of rights that integrate the code that is the right of being able, the status of legal people (1998: 188): ) ' ' Basic rights that result of the development and configuration politically autonomous of the right in the biggest possible degree to help subjective freedoms of share; b) Basic rights that result of the politically autonomous development and configuration of the status of the member of the voluntary association that is the legal community; c) Basic rights that result directamente of the accionabilidade of the rights, that is, of the possibility to legally complain its fulfilment and of the politically autonomous development and configuration of the proteco of the rights individuais.' ' It is, therefore, from those basic rights: equal subjective freedoms of share; status of the legal community and proteco of the individual rights that emerge the essential rights, to participate with equality of chances in processes of formation of the public opinion, in the common will of the citizens in exerting its autonomy politics, by means of that they establish legitimate right. The rights politicians establish the status of free and equal citizens, who they constitute self-reference, making possible to the citizens to change its position legal-material; with the purpose to interpret, to develop and to configure, by means of the exchange of its private autonomy and its public autonomy. .